<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel and Sharp could bring IGZO Screens to Ultrabooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/</link>
	<description>Ultrabook News, Reviews, Database and Forums</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamindublin</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29489</link>
		<dc:creator>adamindublin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more with you lipile &amp; Joe!  It&#039;s about damn time Intel gives us back all day ACTUAL USAGE battery life. All day battery life == requirement; after that make it as thin and light as possible but thin and light first and battery life second is getting pretty old. 

Mobility enthusiasts haven&#039;t even had a choice since the Ultrabook has launched.  As far as I can tell the Ultrabook campaign was about taking away choice and locking in and trying to justify higher profit margins. 

Adam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you lipile &amp; Joe!  It&#8217;s about damn time Intel gives us back all day ACTUAL USAGE battery life. All day battery life == requirement; after that make it as thin and light as possible but thin and light first and battery life second is getting pretty old. </p>
<p>Mobility enthusiasts haven&#8217;t even had a choice since the Ultrabook has launched.  As far as I can tell the Ultrabook campaign was about taking away choice and locking in and trying to justify higher profit margins. </p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultrabook, display Sharp IGZO 3840x2160 pixel &#124; Windows &#124; Digital.it</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29460</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultrabook, display Sharp IGZO 3840x2160 pixel &#124; Windows &#124; Digital.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] garantire pannelli sempre più sottili e definizioni elevatissime. È già stato avvistato un primo prototipo da 13,5 pollici con risoluzione 3840&#215;2160 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] garantire pannelli sempre più sottili e definizioni elevatissime. È già stato avvistato un primo prototipo da 13,5 pollici con risoluzione 3840&#215;2160 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29391</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sure hope not. This whole thin is better is getting annoying. They&#039;re making notebooks thinner yet the footprints are sometimes larger and battery life isn&#039;t that great. Also, I don&#039;t like companies resorting to mini-ports. If a notebook has mini-ports then it wasn&#039;t designed well enough or just plain too thin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope not. This whole thin is better is getting annoying. They&#8217;re making notebooks thinner yet the footprints are sometimes larger and battery life isn&#8217;t that great. Also, I don&#8217;t like companies resorting to mini-ports. If a notebook has mini-ports then it wasn&#8217;t designed well enough or just plain too thin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lipile</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29378</link>
		<dc:creator>lipile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or manufactures will then just start building thinner machines with even smaller batteries &amp; we are still stuck at 5hrs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or manufactures will then just start building thinner machines with even smaller batteries &amp; we are still stuck at 5hrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29364</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope that 10&quot; screen goes into 10&quot; Haswell notebooks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope that 10&#8243; screen goes into 10&#8243; Haswell notebooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsuki</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29344</link>
		<dc:creator>Tsuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the topic of IGZO patents. 

I believe there are two competing implementations. There is Sharp/Japan Semiconductor Energy Laboratory (Made by Sharp I think), and Japan Science and Technology Agencies&#039;s (Licensed to Samsung??? &lt;Why not a Japanese company idk). 

IGZO is very exciting stuff. We haven&#039;t seen such a large drop in display panel power consumption for a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of IGZO patents. </p>
<p>I believe there are two competing implementations. There is Sharp/Japan Semiconductor Energy Laboratory (Made by Sharp I think), and Japan Science and Technology Agencies&#8217;s (Licensed to Samsung??? &lt;Why not a Japanese company idk). </p>
<p>IGZO is very exciting stuff. We haven&#039;t seen such a large drop in display panel power consumption for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future ultrabooks could use Sharp&#039;s low power IGZO LCD displays - Liliputing</title>
		<link>http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09/24/intel-and-sharp-could-bring-igzo-screens-to-ultrabooks/#comment-29338</link>
		<dc:creator>Future ultrabooks could use Sharp&#039;s low power IGZO LCD displays - Liliputing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ultrabooknews.com/?p=5653#comment-29338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with high pixel densities. Sharp is already producing 10 inch, 2560 x 1600 IGZO displays, and Ultrabook News notes that the company has a prototype 13.5 inch, 3840 x 2160 pixel display.    If you&#039;re new here, you [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with high pixel densities. Sharp is already producing 10 inch, 2560 x 1600 IGZO displays, and Ultrabook News notes that the company has a prototype 13.5 inch, 3840 x 2160 pixel display.    If you&#039;re new here, you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
